<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>ChromeIsTheNewIE &amp;mdash; Erik I</title>
    <link>https://erik.itland.no/tag:ChromeIsTheNewIE</link>
    <description>My public writing. You can reach me at @eitland@mstdn.io </description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 10:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Chrome is the new Internet Explorer - 4 stages</title>
      <link>https://erik.itland.no/chrome-is-the-new-internet-explorer-4-stages?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[Filed under #ChromeIsTheNewIE and #web&#xA;&#xA;So I posted a comment over at HN mentioning this quote. And this time I took the time to write down a short explanation since the quote tends to be misunderstood to mean that Chrome is like Internet Explorer (from now on referred to as IE) was in 2009: most people were using it even though it was technically inferior.&#xA;&#xA;Since I have a few minutes more to spend and I want to write more, here is a more detailed explanation:&#xA;&#xA;What we saw in 2009 was only the latest stage of something that had been going on for a while and I will distill it down to 4 stages:&#xA;&#xA;Dominance: Backed by profits from Microsofts cash cows back then - Windows and Office - and also what seems to me like some very ugly tactics from other teams at Microsoft, IE became the dominant browser of the early 2000s. &#xA;&#xA;Monoculture: Pragmatic web developers and project managers realized that they could reach 75% or more of the market without even caring about testing in any other browser except IE. This was possible since smartphones as we know them today didn&#39;t exist and Linux and Macs both didn&#39;t seem to cross the 2% market share on desktops until late 2009, see Usage share of desktop operating systems on Wikipedia for some more details.&#xA;&#xA;Lost interest: Pragmatic business people at Microsoft realized that they had the marked locked down and stopped development of IE. While Firefox and Opera offered better browsers, it didn&#39;t matter for Microsoft initially since everyone were still forced to have an instance of IE available because a number of sites including many banks and official websites didn&#39;t work reliably in anything except IE. &#xA;&#xA;Disruption: While Opera, Safari and Firefox were gaining users, the last of them possibly to a large degree driven by the rise in popularity of Macs and Ubuntu although some of us were using it on Windows as well, the table wasn&#39;t really flipped until the iPhone launched and both devs and management realized this would become huge.&#xA;&#xA;If you enjoyed  this post you might also enjoy my post Are you making a real web application? Or just a Chrome application? were I interview a strawman of the lazy dev who didn&#39;t care to test in other browsers except delIE/delChrome ;-)]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under <a href="https://erik.itland.no/tag:ChromeIsTheNewIE" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">ChromeIsTheNewIE</span></a> and <a href="https://erik.itland.no/tag:web" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">web</span></a></p>

<p>So I posted <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22941822">a comment</a> over at HN mentioning this quote. And this time I took the time to write down a short explanation since the quote tends to be misunderstood to mean that Chrome is like Internet Explorer (from now on referred to as IE) was in 2009: most people were using it even though it was technically inferior.</p>

<p>Since I have a few minutes more to spend and I want to write more, here is a more detailed explanation:</p>

<p>What we saw in 2009 was only the latest stage of something that had been going on for a while and I will distill it down to 4 stages:</p>
<ol><li><p><strong>Dominance</strong>: Backed by profits from Microsofts cash cows back then – Windows and Office – and also what seems to me like some very ugly tactics from other teams at Microsoft, IE became the dominant browser of the early 2000s.</p></li>

<li><p><strong>Monoculture</strong>: Pragmatic web developers and project managers realized that they could reach 75% or more of the market without even caring about testing in any other browser except IE. This was possible since smartphones as we know them today didn&#39;t exist and Linux and Macs both didn&#39;t seem to cross the 2% market share on desktops until late 2009, see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_desktop_operating_systems">Usage share of desktop operating systems</a> on Wikipedia for some more details.</p></li>

<li><p><strong>Lost interest</strong>: Pragmatic business people at Microsoft realized that they had the marked locked down and stopped development of IE. While Firefox and Opera offered better browsers, it didn&#39;t matter for Microsoft initially since everyone were still forced to have an instance of IE available because a number of sites including many banks and official websites didn&#39;t work reliably in anything except IE.</p></li>

<li><p><strong>Disruption</strong>: While Opera, Safari and Firefox were gaining users, the last of them possibly to a large degree driven by the rise in popularity of Macs and Ubuntu although some of us were using it on Windows as well, the table wasn&#39;t really flipped until the iPhone launched and both devs and management realized this would become huge.</p></li></ol>

<p>If you enjoyed  this post you might also enjoy my post <a href="https://erik.itland.no/are-you-making-a-chrome-application-or-a-web-application">Are you making a real web application? Or just a Chrome application?</a> were I interview a strawman of the lazy dev who didn&#39;t care to test in other browsers except <del>IE</del>Chrome ;–)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://erik.itland.no/chrome-is-the-new-internet-explorer-4-stages</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 03:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>